From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 20 12:19:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail4.aracnet.com (mail4.aracnet.com [216.99.193.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B2F14E40 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:19:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from beattie@aracnet.com) Received: from shell1.aracnet.com (IDENT:root@shell1.aracnet.com [216.99.193.21]) by mail4.aracnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16493 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:19:57 -0800 Received: from localhost by shell1.aracnet.com (8.9.3) id MAA09630; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:21:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.aracnet.com: beattie owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:21:17 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Beattie To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: UDF approach comments? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I mentioned earlier, I'm thinking about trying to implement a UDF filesystem. I've been thinking how to start and have come up with the following, and would appreciate any comments. Waht I was thinking about doing, was first writting, (probably using the nullfs code a a base) a userfs, that would allow me to run most of the guts of the filesystem code in a user process. Then I would write the UDF filesystem to run in a user process. What do you think, am I nuts? Is there a better way, a better base for the userfs? Brian Beattie | The only problem with beattie@aracnet.com | winning the rat race ... www.aracnet.com/~beattie | in the end you're still a rat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message