From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 17 02:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290D516A47C; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from spunkymail-a9.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-177.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A1443D5C; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from sauron.lan.box (unknown [200.203.38.244]) by spunkymail-a9.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D9A20813; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:35:07 -0300 From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez To: danial_thom@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20061016233507.d6569808.rnsanchez@wait4.org> In-Reply-To: <20061016231313.63985.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061016032534.GB6398@soaustin.net> <20061016231313.63985.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: SYS_WAIT4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD Stable , performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:35:21 -0000 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Danial Thom wrote: > Why do I need to start a project? Matt Dillon is > already doing it. > > One thing that Matt has proved is that IQ isn't > cumulative. Because hes doing on his own what an > entire team of FreeBSD "engineers" can't do. But > hey, you're not getting paid, so I guess we > shouldn't expect anything good. Bravo for trying > guys. We appreciate your wasted efforts. Sorry, but I don't get your point. Why aren't you using Dragonfly or Linux or any other OS that suits your needs already? > I'm not nearly as concerned about the project at > this point. Dfly will be usable before freebsd, > and at least we know there's someone that knows > what they're doing over there. What concerns me > is the lying to all of the small businessman out > there. People wasting their money on hardware > that freebsd can't utilize. And you clowns > telling them how great it is. Its just plain > dishonest. And another: have you read (and understood) the copyright message? Specifically this part (deCAPSed for your comfort): "This software is provided by the regents and contributors ``as is'' and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed." I don't have the IQ to understand why do you keep using FreeBSD if it makes you unhappy, doesn't support the hardware you bought/have, perform poorly on most situations you have to deal with, and you think its developers don't have a clue of what they're doing. -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."