From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  1 10:48:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BF216A4CE
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  1 Sep 2004 10:48:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1143D46
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  1 Sep 2004 10:48:09 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi)
Received: from [195.163.185.142] (i2-142.rommon.fi [195.163.185.142])
	by silver.he.iki.fi (8.12.10/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i81Am6m1006193
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:48:07 +0300 (EEST)	(envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi)
Message-ID: <4135A8E6.4010402@he.iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:48:06 +0300
From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: dmalloc and pthread
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:48:11 -0000


Has anyone successfully used dmalloc libarary with pthread without 
reverting to enabling debugging when main has been executed already with 
dmalloc_debug_setup?

Pete