From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Jun 15 17:37:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D623D15CC30A; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E48A85141; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8948C17093; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:36:59 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r504198 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20190615173659.GB19307@lonesome.com> References: <201906141610.x5EGAdnN049103@repo.freebsd.org> <20190614165425.GA42674@FreeBSD.org> <8BDC3B40-7FEA-46EA-AE7C-A3C266F6978F@cschubert.com> <20190614175822.GA3336@FreeBSD.org> <20190615061345.GA20346@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5E48A85141 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:37:02 -0000 On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > And essentially nobody tests with GCC 4.2, so things tend to get missed > or broken on powerpc64. No, our build cluster is still using base 4.2 by default. Most of the ports that fail are fixed by specifying a USES that names a newer compiler. Clang is "coming soon". It's a race between the folks working on fixing ports on base vs. the folks working on clang :-) In any case FreeBSD 12 I figure will probably stay the way it is. > I understand why you created USE_GCC=any back in the days, and it has > served a useful purpose. Well ... I just got back from Canada a few days ago, and I'm way behind on email, voicemail, and so on. It will be a bit of time before I can sit down and think about this. mcl