From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 27 2:28:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (frogmorton.shire.net [204.228.145.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE6437B401 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 02:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [68.64.98.90] (helo=localhost) by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #8) id 17CGo6-000D5M-00; Mon, 27 May 2002 05:28:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 05:28:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Adaptec 2100s or 5400s ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: RJ45 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <1FA91014-7154-11D6-8626-000502EDE760@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 04:21 , RJ45 wrote: > > Hello, > I wanted to ask if Adaptec 2100s is well supported by FreeBSD or not. > I have to buy a mail server with RAID capability. > I have seen Adaptec 5400s is supported by FreeBSD but it is a high > profile and high cost product not affordable for me. > I have searched around without success I only found out 5400s is well > supported but I do not know if 2100s is, and I Am interested to know it. > thank you very much > I've been using 1 for over a year in production and another just installed in a production machine. Both for mirroring, not striping. Note that the RAM cache on these is not battery backed. best Chad To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message