From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 16:54:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BEAB57C for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA342AB7 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id g10so2222181pdj.38 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=DOe0qeRJkiiqNsD65DzI4kl474xNbxHF7AO0ZjmzX6k=; b=GApxkZNLYRiQOAhMMQY3dXXSDT4KgzHdrmqi3jxZraUxaUX8rdA7f/CTzPdqsIXb5E 4sMkUowSqbUPdfcZ90xv2fkR2vO+LI/pHZMwpkqoa8Ye1+rBO9xEWOqmM+WbLBF5+rQD npcGWfTsONMuAwMkptyLdIVlzLdg5UHV4qjQMiHhQodpFmnkrKbliAPIjvxEt6tqWXQz 3CH29uaQzQ0l1wwKyGKlFJF6hRynoVJy8Z2Sj7z+iDERy76fkzFV+FeZx2To6dqj/gHg hlDZYVgaontL4S9/lJYSxCjqJr2PQfCjCRy7UUHLfO+SmUo2dRzCNejEXBJC+UoW2Xdh chwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxbisJg2HDcvyLiFYNtt1ALo7D0+f3C3UqMj5vPLqhIyFQzzOIwms9/cWNx/lwJ9rERyyx X-Received: by 10.68.163.132 with SMTP id yi4mr2415161pbb.152.1384448065722; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from birch.localnet ([207.55.103.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sg1sm52706622pbb.16.2013.11.14.08.54.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3BD55E22 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D5EBCFC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAEGsLef067637; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:28 +0000") Message-ID: <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you can > certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you always > did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that it > won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome! What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new system? I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remove all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org