From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 24 19:21:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E658537B68A for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:21:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e3P2k0K18203; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:46:00 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Chuck Robey Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Archive pruning Message-ID: <20000424194600.A14712@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from chuckr@picnic.mat.net on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 08:15:45PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Chuck Robey [000424 19:15] wrote: > I want to bring up a suggestion. I just want a little bit of argument on > it ... and if you're violently opposed, just say so, that's fine. > > I want to suggest that, once a year, we go thru the cvs archive, and prune > away all history more than 3 (or maybe 2, maybe 4) years old. This could > be done without too much pain, I think, in a script. The purpose is to > put some kind of cap on growth of the FreeBSD source archive. While folks > do sometimes go hunting for hugely old materials in the tree, I normally > couldn't care less (when browsing) about history that old. > > Do we really need 5 year old history? Yes. However, I would really like to see a pruned REPO available that carried perhaps the last 3 years of history, perhaps one running off the freebsd cluster. If it became popular enough several of the cvsup mirrors could adopt it. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message