Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:09:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Matt Ruzicka <matt@frii.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **net** Re: Outbound TCP issue, potentially related to'FreeBSD-SA-05:08.kmem [REVISED]' Message-ID: <20050513140619.V15203@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0505131247380.4892@elara.frii.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0505121627400.66727@elara.frii.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0505131031400.66727@elara.frii.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0505131247380.4892@elara.frii.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Matt Ruzicka wrote: > Yes, it still does. And actually the script Maxim attached to his last > email (using our IP's) has an interesting side effect of causing the > connections to fail. > > It doesn't fail right away, but within a few moments. Are you perhaps exhausting all ports? Try changing net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 1024 net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 5000 to net.inet.ip.portrange.first=1024 (unchanged) net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535 so that you have tons of potential ports. You might just have some stuck in the TIME_WAIT state causing you problems or something right now. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050513140619.V15203>