From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 20 16:36:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF48F16A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:36:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D350243D1F for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:36:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (212.181.162.201) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.1.026.7) id 41E3209600D72003 for freebsd-standards@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:36:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 1458 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Apr 2005 16:36:27 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:36:27 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Joseph Koshy Message-ID: <20050420163627.GA1316@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Joseph Koshy , Marcel Moolenaar , freebsd-standards@freebsd.org References: <84dead720504200541539f4c15@mail.gmail.com> <03f22a3c76ac440b97e2179761dfd6fa@xcllnt.net> <20050420155407.GA844@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <84dead720504200910441b9108@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84dead720504200910441b9108@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Standard type for code pointers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:36:30 -0000 On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:10:30PM +0000, Joseph Koshy wrote: > > Except that intptr_t need only be large enough to hold an > > object pointer. This is not necessarily enough to hold a > > function pointer. > > Right. > > > The only standard types that are guaranteed to be able to hold > > a function pointer are other function pointers. > > Right, but there doesn't seem to be a C99 name for function > pointer types. No, but since any function pointer type is large enough to hold any function pointer you can just pick one. (But when you actually call a function pointer, it must be a pointer of the correct type.) > > Is 'register_t' guaranteed to be wide enough? No idea. It is not part of the C standard anyway. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se