From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 25 15: 9:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (s205m7.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D050015153 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:09:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA46881; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:08:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199906252208.PAA46881@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: traceroute breakage in -current In-Reply-To: <3773FCA9.2B9408C6@tdx.co.uk> from Karl Pielorz at "Jun 25, 99 11:03:21 pm" To: kpielorz@tdx.co.uk (Karl Pielorz) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Cc: jdp@polstra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Karl Pielorz writes: > > I just noticed that traceroute in -current is starting its probes > > with port 1 instead of 33435 as it is supposed to do: > > > > tcpdump: listening on fxp0 > > 09:05:03.527313 206.213.73.12.38947 > 204.216.27.21.1: udp 12 [ttl 1] > > > > It broke in revision 1.9 of "src/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c". > > Thanks! - I thought I was going mad! - I've been out the office recently, so > I've not had time to chase it up, but I noticed _exacltly_ the same thing... > This results in my -current machine not being able to traceroute through our > firewall, whereas the 2.2.X / 3.X boxes can... I just fixed this, so see if it works for you now. Sorry about that. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message