Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:39:32 -0800 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.autotools.mk Message-ID: <C7DB396E-DEC9-4990-A7DA-499D5285344F@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86irqpwy35.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200602231043.k1NAhYlr080084@repoman.freebsd.org> <86irqpwy35.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 07, 2006, at 16:59 , Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > .la files are useless on an ELF system Cite, please? Given that around 35% of our libtool-using ports =20 already installed .la files prior to this change, as well as =20 extensive use of them in Linux and NetBSD's pkgsrc (both of which run =20= on ELF-based systems, last time I checked), I'm sure any such =20 critical problems would have been found by now. > , and may be harmful if you are > trying to cross-build software that links against libraries for which > .la files are installed. Again, please cite, particularly given the capability to cross-build =20 pkgsrc. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C7DB396E-DEC9-4990-A7DA-499D5285344F>