Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Apr 2003 15:58:22 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: imake 1.0 vs. 4.3.0
Message-ID:  <20030412225822.GA89415@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030412214156.GA72155@gicco.homeip.net>
References:  <20030412214156.GA72155@gicco.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 11:41:56PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> the port system seems to contain two different imake 1.0 and 4.3.0.
> They share many files. 4.3.0 has some own files. The two ports also
> don't seem to depend one on another.
>=20
> Why are there two versions of imake with common files?
> Are the files with conflicting filenames identical?

imake is for XFree86 3.x.  You have to remove it before you can
install 4.x

Kris

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+mJoOWry0BWjoQKURAvRAAKCySPc4i0nDKKWaAxFdKGYXsbATtACbBBG4
zLPZk3l4yECFnY+1DmC26Nk=
=Q9kr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030412225822.GA89415>