From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 18:41:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C95616A4DA for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.mx.meer.net [209.157.153.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0943D45 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:41:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k74Iewj3048970; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.66.240.106] (public-wireless.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.30]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id k74IeKOV002137; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:40:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: <20060804223000.P97440@delplex.bde.org> References: <200608022150.k72LoQtn098666@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060804223000.P97440@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5F770D91-34A1-4406-AEF8-719E29AFFA87@svcolo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:40:17 -0700 To: Bruce Evans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/100831: sio ignores BIOS information about serial ports - bounty offered X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:41:17 -0000 >> So now I have the exact reverse behavior. The initialization part >> of the >> console goes to the wrong port, and then halfway through booting I >> suddently get console on the right port. Everything is working as expected if you only changed the flags hint. > I said that the port hint must be changed too. I asked for specific instructions. You didn't supply any. I told you what I was going to do, and you said that this should work. Now you're saying I didn't do what I should have. Please provide exact instructions. >> I think I have to agree with Marcel on this -- device hints aren't >> used >> consistently, and having two different processes read it with two >> completely different interpretations of it is nonsense. I can't >> fix one >> without breaking the other. > > Just avoid inconsistencies by making all the hints match the unit > number > assignments that you get although these are not the unit number > assignments > that you want. I haven't the foggiest idea what you mean by this. Exact instructions please? I'm not kidding, this statement doesn't make sense to me. Everything is fine right now except where the console is directed. I have no problem with the console being sio1, as long as sio1 is the console for all parts of the boot/run/shutdown process. Therefore the console flags are the only thing I know to change. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation