From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar 30 12:57:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA12066
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 12:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12057
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 12:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id WAA00729; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 22:57:18 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Søren Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk>
Message-Id: <199703302057.WAA00729@ravenock.cybercity.dk>
Subject: Re: pppd ?? do we have a maintainer ??
In-Reply-To: <199703302055.OAA17217@main.gbdata.com> from Gary Clark II at "Mar 30, 97 02:55:11 pm"
To: gclarkii@main.gbdata.com (Gary Clark II)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 22:57:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Gary Clark II who wrote:
> Søren Schmidt wrote:
> > 
> > I have a couble of fixes to pppd (kernel level ppp) that makes
> > it a little more usable (it doesn't work in 2.2.1 and current :( )
> 
> Huh?  You mean pppd?  The light/2 stuff must have broken it then, because
> I'm running the snap from right before then and have never had a problem.

That cant be :) unless you use it as a client only :)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt               (sos@FreeBSD.org)               FreeBSD Core Team
                Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..