From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 16 17:50:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCB1BB5 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36C010C for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hl1so3552858igb.4 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DzhcPPHxpVguyTq8mz7CbPzIemk5dy5wWVkf1ObKAv4=; b=i+lSh2UgZCIR0IojLP9rmJGgvFGJu0fdn0IPspuCz5RF2zz7cvXUgUI58A2OPwIadz jdBBBFBPpr6y8m77YW5yJSgHNwewMwcWjQSVrUgImcD834gxyU0FHlun7TjIQhKQ088h nfkoLl5PkbFY7YAToh5Ie4zt7mrMqn3//SMjgl7L4ZhqSuSpWv7+vy7qnldod6x9IHIl 8BYGoxh4AAJ3wSleZSJNjJVm9pVn9eXYWxcm1oKiFhO0kwh88BDbYClHHixxPbRIJL1W wzH6o74yQ8UW10L1Ns90Foput0Myhl6hiOW/k1MEArf5oWrPe3RJu2RHL742oS2q0pZ8 PU4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.117.69 with SMTP id kc5mr8808759igb.25.1394992245179; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdavidlists@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.238.77 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 13:50:45 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mXc2vjSadgm6WQc4gwuj9FkbuCA Message-ID: Subject: pkgng vs random port moves From: J David To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:50:45 -0000 Is there a best practice for what to do with pkgng when ports maintainers randomly rename ports? (E.g. mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin being moved to mail/spamassassin a few days ago without notice or warning or documentation in UPDATING.) Prior to pkgng, we used to use pkg_replace for this. portmaster also has an option for it. But pkgng seems to assume that never happens which is (unfortunately) not a valid assumption. Thanks for any advice!