From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 14 04:07:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA20153 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 04:07:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id EAA20146 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 04:07:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rminnich@Sarnoff.COM) Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA05712; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 07:06:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 07:06:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" X-Sender: rminnich@terra To: Doug White cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a problem with mount_portal, which I hope is obvious to someone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG in mount_portal, there is code to activate a socket. This is more or less servicing a kernel request. So, mount_portal opens the socket and then calls sendmsg to return status to the kernel. The actual sendmsg to the kernel returns EINVAL. Anyone else out there having good luck with 3.0-current and portalfs? ron Ron Minnich |"Using Windows NT, which is known to have some rminnich@sarnoff.com | failure modes, on a warship is similar to hoping (609)-734-3120 | that luck will be in our favor"- A. Digiorgio ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message