Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 01:08:09 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Christopher Farley <chris@northernbrewer.com> Cc: mpd6334@cs.rit.edu, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail Message-ID: <20001203010809.A1360@student.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021130480.24326-100000@kraeusen.nbrewer.com>; from chris@northernbrewer.com on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 12:07:30PM -0600 References: <20001202091924.A65973@rit.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021130480.24326-100000@kraeusen.nbrewer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 12:07:30PM -0600, Christopher Farley wrote: > > I think that mailwrapper exists for one purpose: so that you don't > need to modify anything in /usr, and so that Postfix/qmail/whatever > can go in /usr/local. If this is the case, it sounds like a good > idea, but it is a shame that only FreeBSD implements it, and it is > not mentioned in any standard UNIX documentation, the Handbook, > the Complete FreeBSD, etc. That is pretty much the idea, but the other *BSDs also seem to have it so FreeBSD is not exactly the only system that has it. Mentioning somewhere that it exists probably is a good idea but if you install stuff vis the prots mechanism the Makefile there should handle things correctly. Both the qmail and postfix ports appear to be aware of mailwrapper. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001203010809.A1360>