Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:00:19 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, mag@intron.ac Subject: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++ Message-ID: <20060712090019.GA723@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20060711192609.14144.qmail@web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060711192609.14144.qmail@web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-Jul-11 21:26:09 +0200, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: >I think it would be really nice to have the IOKit, or a lookalike that uses >kobj(), available on FreeBSD. Another interesting experiment that I've >mentioned before is OpenBFS: I think the general concensus is that it's up to one of the proponents of this to actually implement it and demonstrate that it works and has no undesirable side-effects. >http://www.bug-br.org.br/openbfs/index.phtml?section=3Ddevelopment =2E.. >- Nicer code=20 >- Easier to maintain=20 These are both very subjective. For someone who isn't comfortable with C++, I doubt either are true. --=20 Peter Jeremy --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEtLoi/opHv/APuIcRAuUzAJsHXDWw9E8jHe29Y6frjfqKlz6saQCfcvPr Fom48m482FPSNhHFmghCc5Q= =Aex4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060712090019.GA723>