From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 22 14:29:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03799 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:29:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03759 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 21:29:35 GMT (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA14936; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:29:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: "Greg A. Woods" cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) In-Reply-To: <199804222056.QAA02964@brain.zeus.leitch.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Greg A. Woods wrote: > If you're looking for a consensus, then no. ;-) > > (in certain circumstances I find any dynamic loading of code, be it > through shared libraries, or run-time loading of .o's, or whatever, to > be highly undesirable, and I think that's effectively what several other > people have concluded too) Well said. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message