From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 15:42:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9371637B401; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.attbi.com (rwcrmhc12.attbi.com [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E211343FB1; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:42:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([12.232.168.4]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2003060922425001400ab3qme>; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:42:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA49859; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:42:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <20030609153323.G36983@root.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_core.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 22:42:53 -0000 On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > A white-space nit I noticed. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.56 +1 -1 src/sys/vm/uma_core.c > > > > --- src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1.55 Sun Apr 27 23:11:32 2003 > > +++ src/sys/vm/uma_core.c Mon Jun 9 12:40:34 2003 > > @@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ > > > > /* Do we need to remove from any lists? */ > > if (slab->us_freecount+1 == zone->uz_ipers) { > > - LIST_REMOVE(slab, us_link); > > + LIST_REMOVE(slab,us_link); > > LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&zone->uz_free_slab, slab, us_link); > > } else if (slab->us_freecount == 0) { > > LIST_REMOVE(slab, us_link); > > Is that correct style to remove the space after the comma? The former way > seems more correct. Also, it differs from the LIST_REMOVE immediately > after. I am guessing a patch applied backwards or something.. I'm sure that's not what he inteded :-) > > -Nate >