From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Nov 13 17: 7:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-206-90-77.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.206.90.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158D237B479 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAE1DoF01168; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:13:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011140113.eAE1DoF01168@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: mjacob@feral.com, wkb@freebie.demon.nl, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Test success for AS2100 and AS1000A In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:13:12 EST." <14864.8339.742471.148275@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:13:50 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > Possibly not. It's getting time for them to do so. I've had it on my list for > > a while to do if_wx as a sample for Bill Paul and others to think about. > > An example would certainly be helpful. Some sort of sgmap_mbuf() (or > whatever NetBSD's interface is would be very helpful). I've talked with Bill Paul about this quite a bit; the real blocking factor is just the lack of a decent interface for s/g mapping mbufs, especially one that deals well with alignment issues. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message