Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:56:09 +0500 From: applecom@inbox.ru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ghostscript device 'gdi' Message-ID: <op.tmjejvz0hbloih@xml.opera.com> In-Reply-To: <200701212118.12529.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <op.tmi51il7hbloih@xml.opera.com> <200701212118.12529.lists@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> wrote: > On Sunday 21 January 2007 20:07, applecom@inbox.ru wrote: >> My experience with ghoscscript device 'gdi' is that even patched it >> generates a correct data only for 600 dpi resolution. With -r300' opt= ion >> printer makes pages with large horizontal black and grey stripes. >> Does somebody use Samsung laser printer and ghostscript device 'gdi' = for >> printing to it? > > I have a Lexmark E210, which is basically a rebranded Samsung ML-1210.= I > print to it using Cups and the foomatic scripts/filters and haven't ha= d = > any > problems. I know it uses gs with the gdi device on the back end. I jus= t > printed a test page at 300 dpi and it looks fine. I have Samsung ML-1210 exactly, foomatic-filters-3.0.2_4, ghostscript-gnu-7.07_15. Try to print alphabet.ps from ghostscript examples with 300 dpi. For example: 'foomatic-rip --ppd <path to gdi ppd> -o Resolution=3D300x300dpi -o PageSize=3DA4 /usr/local/share/ghostscript/7.07/examples/alphabet.ps > /dev/ulpt0'. Is page printed well? For me isn't, only ugly stripes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tmjejvz0hbloih>