From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 27 20: 9:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B22437B598 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:08:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm016-005.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.213]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28724; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:08:16 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D221719A6; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:06:28 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Warner Losh , Wes Peters , Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20000627230628.F42285@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006272329.RAA50325@harmony.village.org> <10451.962149487@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <10451.962149487@localhost>; from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 04:44:47PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 04:44:47PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Well, I've certainly seen more "I'm against it!" cries than I've seen > "I'm for it!", leading me towards thinking that maybe it's Just Not > Worth It and the standard lpr is just fine and can be augmented by > apsfilter for those who want more out of it. I concur. My motivation for originally supporting LPRng was because the 26,000 lines of code extra (or whatever it was) was much less than the amount of junk apsfilter installs that I don't need. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message