From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 16:11:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A2516A4CF for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21FB43D31 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:11:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i2S0BYf12202; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:11:34 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200403280011.i2S0BYf12202@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: flowers@users.sourceforge.net (Dan MacMillan) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:11:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Dan MacMillan" at Mar 26, 2004 10:52:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Jerry McAllister cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD - Linux / Unix ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:11:44 -0000 > > > > > > > B. Unix > > > Depends on what you mean by Unix. There is code in it that > > > derives from the original AT&T UNIX. > > > > It is this. Although the idea of Unix may have started in Bell Labs, > > I thought the big lawsuits 10+ years ago and lots of work by early > > developers settled that no code in the current BSD line can be said > > to derive from Bell Labs code. > > Actually, that is not true. The only point the lawsuits settled > definitively is that BSD did not infringe on USL's copyrights. In fact it > was basically stipulated that some parts of NET/2 / BSDi =were= derived > (even copied) from the USL code, but that it didn't matter because the > copyrights being claimed had been abandoned or were invalid for one reason > or another. Interesting - more complicated parts than are usually mentioned. ////jerry > > -Dan >