From owner-freebsd-gnome  Wed Oct  2  8:20:48 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 766D037B401; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 08:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ncc-1701.webonaut.com (static62-99-136-018.adsl.inode.at [62.99.136.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E49D43E42; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 08:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com)
Received: from quikquik (quikquik [127.0.0.1])
	by ncc-1701.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 114C56FB75; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 17:20:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade
From: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <1033569470.333.0.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar>
	<20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de>
	<1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> 
	<20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> 
	<1033558909.38552.2.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> 
	<1033569470.333.0.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 02 Oct 2002 17:20:49 +0200
Message-Id: <1033572049.38552.7.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-gnome.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Am Mi, 2002-10-02 um 16.37 schrieb Joe Marcus Clarke:
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 07:41, Franz Klammer wrote:
> > Am Mi, 2002-10-02 um 10.47 schrieb Marc Recht:=20
> > > > This isn't going to happen anytime soon.  We're shipping 4.7-RELEAS=
E
> > > > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop.  The primary reasons being=
 lack
> > > Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-)
> > >=20
> > > > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best.
> > > Indeed.
> > > =20
> > > > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into t=
he
> > > > tree.  The downside of this is that there will be one more version =
of
> > > > GNOME to support.
> > > But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing=
 the components with "official" beta versions?
> > >=20
> > from this point of view i go along with marc.=20
> >=20
> > maybee you send some people the ports who want test 2.1=20
> > and if they don't have problems commit them.=20
> >=20
> > i glad to test the ports because there are still my xinerma-problems.=20
> > currently i've turend off my second monitor.=20
>=20
> Read the release notes for GTK 2.1.0: working multihead support ;-).

i know. that's the reason why =BBi'm glad to test=AB it :-)

franz.

--=20
WEBONAUT.com
http://webonaut.com
mailto:klammer@webonaut.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message