From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 17 05:33:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ED9106566B for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (pool-98-108-131-11.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [98.108.131.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52D08FC13 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sopwith.solgatos.com (Postfix, from userid 66) id E6E17B64F; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id UAA01961; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:13:46 GMT Message-Id: <200911162013.UAA01961@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:13:46 PST From: Dieter Subject: VIA firewire controller and "non CYCLEMASTER mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:33:08 -0000 It has been over a year, time to ask again: > If we assume that I need to get the VIA into non-CYCLEMASTER mode, > (since that worked with the NEC), any ideas why > > fwcontrol -u 0 -f 0 > fwcontrol -u 0 -r > > doesn't force the VIA into non-CYCLEMASTER mode the way > it (with -u 1) works for NEC? PR: kern/113785 VIA 6307, reported as: fwohci0: port 0xa800-0xa87f mem 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe7ff irq 18 at device 6.0 on pci1 AFAIK, the difference between 6306 and 6307 is the number of ports. Currently running FreeBSD 7.1 amd64.