Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 22:36:34 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f6826de8fbdf - main - www/firefox: update to 107.0 (rc2) Message-ID: <Y26kQpynZDMblguC@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <Y26XHTtfjQWQMR8Z@elch.exwg.net> References: <202211102100.2AAL0bnl052227@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y251VmC5Kh/10eaS@hades.panopticon> <Y26XHTtfjQWQMR8Z@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net) wrote: > > Would it be possible to use real version (e.g. 107.0rc2) for the port > > instead of faking release candidate as an official release? > > Somewhat difficult, as the final release is actually the last release > candidate, unchanged (really, distinfo doesn't change) so we'd be stuck > with 107.0rc2 (or something) until 108.0; and firefox itself believess > it's 107.0, too (that's even somewhat true for the betas, but you never > see them). > And for the minors often there's only one rc, which then becomes GA, > and I don't want package churn for no-ops. Do we really need rc's packaged then? -- Dmitry Marakasov . amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y26kQpynZDMblguC>