From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 9 7:42:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from s1.ds.net (s1.ds.net [207.239.204.1]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0553DFC; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ds.net (i1p89.cmh-oh.ds.net [207.239.205.89]) by s1.ds.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04057; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:41:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38A18AAA.19D0BBD7@ds.net> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:41:30 -0500 From: "James A. Mutter" Reply-To: jmutter@ds.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Cc: Jonathan & Charmane Frazier , "Jonathan E. Lyons" , "Jonathan C. Frazier" , Stanley Hopcroft , FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD and MS Windows. What about select() andmemorymanagement etc ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > Nope, I am correct. Microsoft used Redhat for a long time for their web servers > > also, not just hotmail. I'm not sure what they are running now, but you used to be > > able to go to linus.microsoft.com and see the redhat/apache "successful > > installation" page. I found it quite amusing to say the least. Solaris is being > > used exclusively on hotmail, NT couldn't handle it. > > No you are wrong. Just because there is a Linux install somewhere > within *.microsoft.com means very little. www.microsoft.com is NT, and > always has been NT. That is a known fact. > > hotmail is not exclusively Solaris. They use a FreeBSD and Solaris mix. > This is well known too, and Microsoft has stated this publicly several > times. For the non-believers in the crowd check out this link: http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message