From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 9 2:48:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B76714D42 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:48:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mephisto.imp.ch (mb@mephisto.imp.ch [157.161.1.22]) by mail.imp.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29326; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:48:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mb@localhost) by mephisto.imp.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03256; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:48:46 +0100 (MEZ) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:48:45 +0100 From: Martin Blapp To: "Crist J. Clark" Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/14709: umountall requests possibly mishandled by mountd(8) In-Reply-To: <200001090222.VAA10117@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, > All of this is contained in the original PR and the mail which it > references. From my point of view (I am no NFS expert), the problem > must be fixed with mountd and not clients. Fixing the FreeBSD client > does not help me because the machines causing the messages are not > FreeBSD machines. If the IRIX clients are doing something odd that > should be logged, then I think the fix needs to be to make that error > message useful. Saying the request came from itself is either > incorrect (it should say it came from the client), or it is at best, > useless (why bother with that portion of the message if it always is > reporting itself as the origin of the request) or at worst, > misleading. Ok, let me explain the problem: On the client side, there has to be also a mountd(8) running to be able to see the problem. If the client is shutdown, mountd(8) sends a broadcast RPC_UMNTALL message into the subnet it belongs to. To the nature of our RPC implementation, the RPC call gets remapped and looks like it comes from the local interface. And because of security it gets remapped on unsecure ports. I have fixed mountd(8) to not send anymore these RPC_UMNTALL broadcast messages. As I know NetBSD, OpebBSD, BSDI have still this behaviour. If IRIX uses the same or a similar mountd(8) implementation, they will generate the same problem. So can you please snoop in your subnet, to look where the umntall calls are coming from ? All the machine needs to have is a running mountd(8). Please install etheral from the ports or use tcpdump to resolve the problem. Then shutdown each machine and look if you recieve such call. Thank you. Martin Martin Blapp, mb@imp.ch ------------------------------------------------ Improware AG, UNIX solution and service provider Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland Phone: +41 79 370 26 05, Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 ------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message