Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:07:39 -0500 (EST) From: will andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, se@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Subject: Re: Qt/KDE/bsd.port.mk upgrade PRs imminent Message-ID: <XFMail.000110140739.andrews@technologist.com> In-Reply-To: <vqcg0w5anmh.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10-Jan-00 Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > Because the version doesn't bump that often? :) Also, different ports > may require different parts (or languages) of kde. Or do you think > it's ok to just always use kdelibs? I've never seen any port that doesn't use kdelibs and calls itself a KDE program. You're right, however.. neither Qt 1.4x nor kdelibs 1.x updates their libraries much nowadays. They're pretty much done with 1.x, I think. > Copying and then patching, so unless the new port looks nothing like > the old one, a diff would be better. Ok, I will send-pr a qt145 port later this week, along with all patches to all kde ports, to upgrade them for NEWGCC. I hope that it will not make a difference that I use 4.0-CURRENT with g++ 2.95.2 (as opposed to 3.4-STABLE with g++ 2.95.2). I don't have access to my -STABLE box during the week, so I hope these PRs work on someone else's -STABLE. They should be in by Wednesday or Thursday afternoon. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000110140739.andrews>