From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Fri May 27 19:30:53 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28851B4C7DD;
 Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu)
Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu
 [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69E019F2;
 Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu)
Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id E769161FED; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:30:49 +0200
From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <stdin@niklaas.eu>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, tinc@tinc-vpn.org
Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD
Message-ID: <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 tinc@tinc-vpn.org
References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <CAN6yY1uEwttkd7iCBrjoFytUjUiNL1Ew-j7pm=-S=dY9HBXPYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <CAN6yY1sNqSfjvV5j4vfmm=h=RCP2uiFRXaBzvdJGGV-gX_vjTA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WChQLJJJfbwij+9x"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sNqSfjvV5j4vfmm=h=RCP2uiFRXaBzvdJGGV-gX_vjTA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:53 -0000


--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Kevin Oberman [2016-05-27 12:02 -0700] :

> This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the
> primary reason for them. (N.B. I am not aware of your architectural
> details, and ULAs for the VPNs might be appropriate.)

Is it? I didn't know that I can use link-local addresses for the VPN
too. How do I decide between link-local or unique-local addresses for
the VPN? What do I make the decision dependent on?

    Niklaas

--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=jpwW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x--