From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Dec 30 22:35:26 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA10525
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 22:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA10514
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 22:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
	by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4)
	id RAA11838; Sun, 31 Dec 1995 17:34:56 +1100
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199512310634.RAA11838@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Tick, tock, adjust the clock
To: bde@zeta.org.au
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1995 17:34:53 +1100 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, peter@haywire.dialix.com
In-Reply-To:  
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I wrote:

> My comments above are based on the assumption that you have a consistently
> low latency link to your chosen clock reference(s).
  ^^^^^^^^^^^

Sorry .. should've been "low jitter" .. latency doesn't matter so long as
it's consistent,

	michael