Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 May 2007 15:10:57 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps))
Message-ID:  <20070511191057.GA25833@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <17988.48879.828384.170557@bhuda.mired.org>
References:  <f20c8u$htp$1@sea.gmane.org> <17987.52037.112351.872442@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511015156.GA77895@xor.obsecurity.org> <17987.52970.398402.580727@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511021249.GA78729@xor.obsecurity.org> <17987.57305.7130.873114@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511051852.GA89359@xor.obsecurity.org> <17988.32573.910854.388638@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511184259.GA23483@xor.obsecurity.org> <17988.48879.828384.170557@bhuda.mired.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <20070511184259.GA23483@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> typed:
> > The point is that the real problem is: "how do you arrange the bits on
> > disk", not "how do you wrap that in a package system".  Until you
> > figure out a workable on-disk arrangement for the files, questions
> > about packaging are not relevant.  And it seems that option 1 is the
> > only workable one in practise (unless you have some other idea), which
> > can easily be achieved today with a couple of hours of kernel hacking.
> 
> There are clearly other workable ideas - as I said, the linux folks
> managed to make it work. But it's not an easy problem. I certainly
> wouldn't suggest rebuilding the packaging system to deal with this,
> except as part of a larger effort. On the other hand, since people are
> working on the ports/package system (I see port/pkg database and some
> ports infrastructure work in the current SoC projects list), not
> keeping this goal in mind would seem to be a bit short-sighted. I
> wouldn't be surprised if your option #1 could benefit from this as
> well.

But you said you were interested in working on it...so what is your
idea?

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070511191057.GA25833>