From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Wed Feb 6 10:32:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C09014CE667 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f47.google.com (mail-ot1-f47.google.com [209.85.210.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABAE58EB7E for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f47.google.com with SMTP id s5so11004499oth.7 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 02:32:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pLAWnhxVIvuFqKTIEAbRn7iIBci+Y+pHf6oOaVuc8dU=; b=goY6aeFmplDMYcbCZKG4cyskxZmVvW/xzEBCWieXJgEwBacrY9iqc6AsQqZzbMbYbf I98U6Dq9DiBEKbLl1VtYGi0AlQzvUWJ4CcQlHyZXNGV5PwvutgOEXoZ9xfwFHQNQN7QB BTuh6NdIN6+DWZ9AB+VxK5EZ6c17hFLSfBhMhl19SFVwi9Bpss28LrZSNKrnR4E/CjVb Ud0gtY6v1jO1fYYBjUAiNDIeKb+CDRaIEgtDtrH3N9Zg9303uEY4uyVMT0sU0/ynjxbm H+LwpryXDU0mIhq+7n8pXUmDoSmCAHT0QzjV2ksL+o9fhy+GN9rWxH3/9/yIlnZtNyPI vc3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYQ5uLhFWnam1qX/2OpHxBpx2iLwNYTEEgxGMZr+BCAXbPgEb9L Exl+y6n+TK9LEMxZtfH3IFL3bHE/OgL+MSr1dT/JIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iajx+lMX7N3ov9PczrrB6SNDWbBc8yECTjNtM4k2vY1hhC01GHu2ICPoRV8XkhhpFtpKV8MI0hz68BHOhLnmGc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5f06:: with SMTP id f6mr5438258oti.258.1549449124202; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 02:32:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Igor Mozolevsky Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:31:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Archiving higher bandwith than 1GBit/s on FreeBSD? (USB3?) To: georg@bege.email Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ABAE58EB7E X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mozolevsky@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mozolevsky@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[47.210.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; IP_SCORE(-1.27)[ip: (-0.53), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.77), asn: 15169(-1.96), country: US(-0.07)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[hybrid-lab.co.uk]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[47.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.37)[-0.369,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk,mozolevsky@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk,mozolevsky@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:32:11 -0000 On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 10:14, wrote: > Well it might be vague, but money isnt the main problem - if its only a > money problem, then we know its at least possible. > Im looking forward to use something for my Laptop and maybe for a NUC. > So PCI-E cards are out of the game... else it would be easy. > > Maybe Thunderbolt 3 is a solution, I read there are devices... but I > guesss then again there is no FreeBSD support for drivers. Can't speak for your laptop, but why not use a Supermicro (no, I don't work for them) ITX (if you are wanting "small") that has an onboard 10GbE, for example (like some of the mobos of the X10SDV-... or X11SDV-... variety) if money isn't a limiting factor instead of a NUC (was NUC ever designed to be "pumping" data?)? -- Igor M.