From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 10 01:10:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA10609 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:10:33 -0800 Received: from estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.42.147]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA10603 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:10:31 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA01572; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:10:22 -0800 Message-Id: <199503100910.BAA01572@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: estienne.cs.berkeley.edu: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: davidg@Root.COM cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SNAP or current? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:58:34 PST." <199503100858.AAA04511@corbin.Root.COM> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:10:22 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>Can we actually install shared libraries when multi-user again? I haven't >>tried for a day or two. I don't think we should release a SNAP until at leas >t >>a multi-user make world works again. > > If this fails for some reason, please send me a detailed bug report (or >better yet, file it with send-pr). > >-DG Will do. I won't be home until late tomorrow, but I have a crash dump sitting there from the last time it happened. I'll try it with a fresh kernel as well. There were other reports of this on the lists, so I thought it was a well known problem... -- Justin T. Gibbs ============================================== TCS Instructional Group - Programmer/Analyst 1 Cory | Po | Danube | Volga | Parker | Torus ==============================================