Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 13:00:00 +0100 From: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> To: Moin Rahman <bofh@freebsd.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Port update and consumers bump Message-ID: <CAFDf7U%2BhKDXQrNtk0SCOK8zDG6MXc=Wk5gwCYL4XZGGYFhtnOA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ED261321-0966-498D-8B83-DF33295CD9DC@freebsd.org> References: <CAFDf7UJYt2TRfX3xqdzouPWi_mYhk6iSoosaN40D9Kh-JbBFSw@mail.gmail.com> <ZSE4T-J5EhunLJnd@fc.opsec.eu> <CAFDf7UKE4kQN_oib%2BnSsuOMA=TY8EHE37C%2Bha8pDrxrMvRYFTg@mail.gmail.com> <1212FFB4-B9D2-4303-8817-82542F94DE53@freebsd.org> <CAFDf7UJ3FqfUtCyQWcPFShz4WhOqNgD4s0h0e%2BMUaT_ftu2cGQ@mail.gmail.com> <ED261321-0966-498D-8B83-DF33295CD9DC@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--00000000000079bb8d06071f199d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > This 3.2 search might be counterproductive as we have an option "3.0+" > which also indicates 3.2 as a valid value. ports with 3.0+ will use 3.0 for building without changes . For this particular update involving 3.2 shouldn't we focus on consumers using 3.2 only? --00000000000079bb8d06071f199d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo= ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left= :1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> This 3.2 search might be counterproductive as we have an option "3.0+&= quot; which also indicates 3.2 as a valid value.</blockquote><div><br></div= ><div>ports with 3.0+ will use 3.0 for building without changes . For this = particular update involving 3.2 shouldn't we focus on consumers using 3= .2 only? <br></div></div></div> --00000000000079bb8d06071f199d--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFDf7U%2BhKDXQrNtk0SCOK8zDG6MXc=Wk5gwCYL4XZGGYFhtnOA>