From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 14 18:30:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530DD1065686 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal4.es.net [198.124.252.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011678FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207]) by postal4.es.net (Postal Node 4) with ESMTP (SSL) id UCS29649 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:30:49 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP (SSL) id UCS10348 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:30:48 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id DA9EA4500F for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:30:47 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1224009047_3591P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:30:47 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20081014183047.DA9EA4500F@ptavv.es.net> X-Sender-IP: 198.128.3.207 X-Sender-Domain: es.net X-Recipent: ; X-Sender: X-To_Name: X-To_Domain: freebsd.org X-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-To_Email: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-To_Alias: freebsd-stable Subject: Status of Flash 9 on stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:30:50 -0000 --==_Exmh_1224009047_3591P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though: ** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9: Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state I also thought that there might be a solution to the sound issue. Can anyone confirm the status? I would be happy to delete the IGNORE line if I thought it would work and I know what changes might be needed to get it to work. Even without sound, it would probably be useful. Too many sites are using Flash 9 for the entry page and there is no way to get to the site at all with Flash 7. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1224009047_3591P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFI9OVXkn3rs5h7N1ERAlFSAJ9Id7lEMdzJcOBW+f4cK9nk/Tev8QCdHGDB eFkWqpv7jP+PfVMLuoQUTHE= =hz6k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1224009047_3591P--