Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:01:51 +0300
From:      Andrey Simonenko <simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, rmacklem@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why vfs_stdcheckexp is a VFS operation?
Message-ID:  <20120831110151.GA21041@pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <140200696.1251333.1346245151029.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <503D301F.5080607@delphij.net> <140200696.1251333.1346245151029.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:59:11AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> 
> It seems that changing the semantics of /etc/exports is very difficult
> (it's a stumbling block w.r.t. adoption of nfse, as an example) at this
> time so, although confusing, exporting a directory that is not a mount
> point results in the entire mount point exported for NFS RPCs, but a
> restriction of only mounting that directory is enforced for the Mount
> protocol (only done at mount time and only for NFSv3).
> 

Which information is the statement about semantics of exports(5) and
nfse is based on?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120831110151.GA21041>