From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 31 11:01:55 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B434E106566B;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua)
Received: from comsys.kpi.ua (comsys.kpi.ua [77.47.192.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6213C8FC08;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pm513-1.comsys.kpi.ua ([10.18.52.101]
	helo=pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua)
	by comsys.kpi.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>)
	id 1T7Oz3-0005k3-1J; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:01:53 +0300
Received: by pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 3F1FB1CC23; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:01:52 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:01:51 +0300
From: Andrey Simonenko <simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Message-ID: <20120831110151.GA21041@pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>
References: <503D301F.5080607@delphij.net>
	<140200696.1251333.1346245151029.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <140200696.1251333.1346245151029.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Authenticated-User: simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua
X-Authenticator: plain
X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail)
X-Exim-Version: 4.63 (build at 28-Apr-2011 07:11:12)
X-Date: 2012-08-31 14:01:53
X-Connected-IP: 10.18.52.101:63539
X-Message-Linecount: 28
X-Body-Linecount: 12
X-Message-Size: 1325
X-Body-Size: 576
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, rmacklem@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Why vfs_stdcheckexp is a VFS operation?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:01:55 -0000

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:59:11AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> 
> It seems that changing the semantics of /etc/exports is very difficult
> (it's a stumbling block w.r.t. adoption of nfse, as an example) at this
> time so, although confusing, exporting a directory that is not a mount
> point results in the entire mount point exported for NFS RPCs, but a
> restriction of only mounting that directory is enforced for the Mount
> protocol (only done at mount time and only for NFSv3).
> 

Which information is the statement about semantics of exports(5) and
nfse is based on?