From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 26 03:07:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EAE16A407 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB76643D45 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:07:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tmclaugh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.2.68] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.2.68]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9Q37qNU010272; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom McLaughlin To: Phillip Neumann In-Reply-To: <1161827282.1035.47.camel@localhost> References: <1161800392.1443.7.camel@localhost> <1161827282.1035.47.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EUB1wyqjLVV0gsaGNoN/" Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:07:51 -0400 Message-Id: <1161832071.1443.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] Mono and it's future on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:07:54 -0000 --=-EUB1wyqjLVV0gsaGNoN/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 22:48 -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: > El mi=E9, 25-10-2006 a las 14:19 -0400, Tom McLaughlin escribi=F3: >=20 > The thing i see more difficult, is how to effectively make the bsd# > ports tree flow into the FreeBSD one. If there is no commiter interest > (until now Tom), eventually PR would be stucked. But from the other > point of view, as mono is now part of GNOME, the GNOME guys could manage > this :-] >=20 I just want to point out that the _biggest_ issue by far is maintaining and actually porting the lang/mono port. That was something I was never able to do well. tom --=20 | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | BSD# http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD | --=-EUB1wyqjLVV0gsaGNoN/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFQCaH4zniJeL3s9gRAgyQAKCYNj4OCGZTYNgveVbeJaGshKk3tACeNpxw dDip5JCanaHP1WhoadfKYp0= =HneJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EUB1wyqjLVV0gsaGNoN/--