From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 27 04:48:07 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA04213 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 04:48:07 -0700 Received: from laphroaig.cs.hut.fi (hsu@laphroaig.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.94]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA04136 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 04:47:24 -0700 Received: by laphroaig.cs.hut.fi id AA24013 (5.65c8/HUTCS-C 1.3 for hackers@freebsd.org); Tue, 27 Jun 1995 14:43:09 +0300 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 14:43:09 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu Message-Id: <199506271143.AA24013@laphroaig.cs.hut.fi> To: Joe Greco Cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi (Heikki Suonsivu), davidg@root.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router In-Reply-To: <199506261519.KAA29341@brasil.moneng.mei.com> References: <199506250512.IAA07090@shadows.cs.hut.fi> <199506261519.KAA29341@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Joe Greco writes: > Say WHAT? > > I used to have a 386SX/16 here in the office with a SMC Ethernet card and > ^^ > a bunch of 16550's, that I used as a terminal server (recently upgraded to a > 386DX/16). It handles 4 modems, a high speed (38400) network connection > to another box, and from time to time when I am loading FreeBSD, I connect > another 386sx/16 with 16450's, and set up a hardwire SLIP link between the > two at 115200. Have you tried current kernels? We haven't had any problems with systems running 1.1.5.1 (including one 386/40 with 5 active ethernets and 4 active serial ports?) > So I know of at least one 386sx/16 that can soak up 38.4k with 16*4*50's, > and my router was certainly capable of blasting lots of data all over the > place at speeds rather higher than that.... I have two systems 386/16 ----- 38400bps leased ------------ 486/40 SMC 8013 5 ethernets (NE2000 and SMC) 6 16550 serial ports (4 and 4 used, respectively) separate 2-port 16550 card all ports true 16550 chips (not true NS) probably late revision (new) Both a dedicated routers, with extra hardware to minimum (multi-io, ide boot disk, not much used, vga, ethernet cards and serial ports). Both machines loose interrupts in large quantity. 386/16 is running 2.0.5, 486/40 has got a bit older -current kernel (a couple of weeks, I guess). 486/40 has got a couple of native 115.2k leased connections, which may be the source of the problem there, but it doesn't seem to be related to activity on those links. The only software running on these systems are pppd's and gated. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN