Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:58:31 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes Message-ID: <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Sorry for stepping up so late, but this saves options under
> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/options
>
> Lots of ports have the same PORTNAME (ie 'openldap' for
> net/openldap2[012]-(client|server), 'apache' for russian/apache13,
> www/apache(13|13-fp|2|21)). Some conflict, but -client/-server don't.
> Either each port has to set OPTIONSFILE to
> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/something,
> or we may use LATEST_LINK instead of PORTNAME:
Why don't you think we could use ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGNAME} instead?
PKGNAME has no conflicts.
--
Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400D4217.4090901>