From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 8 03:24:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C902106564A for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcomuskus@une.net.co) Received: from une-avas-out02.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41B58FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (une-avas-out02.une.net.co [127.0.0.1]) by myhostname.mydomain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9201C0710; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:24:03 -0500 (COT) Received: from unevm-pmta11.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.119]) by une-avas-out02.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B3E1C0B3B; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:24:02 -0500 (COT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by unevm-pmta11.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CB238808D; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:23:55 -0500 (COT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unevm-pmta11.une.net.co Received: from unevm-pmta11.une.net.co ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (unevm-pmta11.une.net.co [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EsAQPqVzrjtG; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:23:55 -0500 (COT) Received: from [172.16.1.2] (unknown [190.71.52.215]) by unevm-pmta11.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 74AF5388088; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:23:53 -0500 (COT) Message-ID: <5021DBCF.4050302@une.net.co> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:23:59 -0500 From: Marco Muskus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Anonymous Remailer \(austria\)" Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 03:24:05 -0000 El 07/08/12 16:09, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >> >> English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the >> way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. > > Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails. > Did you personally try ZFS ?