From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Dec 23 01:02:48 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA25394
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 23 Dec 1996 01:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA25389
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 1996 01:02:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA11360; Mon, 23 Dec 1996 01:01:29 -0800 (PST)
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need a quick review of some bsd.port.mk changes 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Dec 1996 01:22:58 MST."
             <E0vc5f0-0002nj-00@rover.village.org> 
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 01:01:27 -0800
Message-ID: <11334.851331687@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  .if (${OPSYS} == "NetBSD")
>  MD5?=			/usr/bin/md5
> +.elif (${OPSYS} == "OpenBSD")
> +MD5?=			/bin/md5
>  .else
>  MD5?=			/sbin/md5

Not to condemn these patches in general, but *jesus christ*, can't ANY
of the 3 BSD OSes agree on where md5 should go? :-( :-(

What's our rationale for having it in /sbin again?

> +.if (${OPSYS} == "OpenBSD")
> +FETCH_CMD?=		/usr/bin/ftp
> +.else
>  FETCH_CMD?=		/usr/bin/fetch
> +.endif

Really?  OpenBSD's stock ftp handles fetch-by-URL?

> +.if (${OPSYS} == "OpenBSD")
> +EXTRACT_CMD?=	/bin/tar
> +.else
>  EXTRACT_CMD?=	/usr/bin/tar
> +.endif

Bleah..  See md5 comments. :-(

This is just getting silly.

						Jordan