From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Sep 30 5:50: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5017D151FB for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id FAA50306; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 05:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909301250.FAA50306@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/14040: amd has wrong uname data compile in it Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/14040; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Jim Pirzyk Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/14040: amd has wrong uname data compile in it Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:45:42 +0200 On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 08:41:34 -0400, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > I understand that it is a semantic issue, hence the low priority and > severity. > > Does this make sense? Yes, I just want to know what problems you think would be caused in such a case. I ask because this is something that'll "go wrong" very seldom, and I'm pretty sure that osversion is supposed to store the os under which amd was compiled, not what it's running under right now. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message