Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Jan 2001 12:26:30 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        "Yonny Cardenas B." <ycardena@yahoo.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Kernel programming
Message-ID:  <xzpk87mh5ll.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Alexander Langer's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:20:56 %2B0100"
References:  <3A6CF781.C9C2871A@yahoo.com> <20010123003756.A33892@hub.freebsd.org> <xzpu26qh61r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010123122056.A8416@cichlids.cichlids.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des@ofug.org):
> > Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> > > There recently (last week or something) was a thread here or on
> > > another mailinglist on how to debug kernel moduls, which is a little
> > > bit tricky.
> > It's also documented in the handbook.
> Well, actually debugging modules is a little bit more tricky than
> debugging kernels with statically linked drivers.

It's still documented in the handbook. I don't see where you find a
contradiction here.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk87mh5ll.fsf>