From owner-freebsd-net Mon Feb 11 11:20:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A3B37B402 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020211192009.VAWH1147.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:20:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA17612; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:14:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:14:54 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Mike Silbersack Cc: Tariq Rashid , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: squeeze more performance out of natd? In-Reply-To: <20020211130512.S84750-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Tariq Rashid wrote: > > The best way to improve performance would probably be to rewrite natd to > use kqueue instead of select. I'm not sure how difficult this would be, > you might wish to talk to jlemon if you have any questions on the best way > to tackle the project. or just select on a really small array of bits.. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message