From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 2 13:43:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8472F16A4DF; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8320E43D7B; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FA81703F; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:43:46 +0000 (UTC) To: "M. Warner Losh" From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:32:32 CST." <20060802.073232.-494097392.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:43:45 +0000 Message-ID: <17702.1154526225@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/101228: [nanobsd] [patch] Two more entries for FlashDevice.sub X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:43:49 -0000 In message <20060802.073232.-494097392.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes : >flashdevice.sub has at best dubious value to start with. There are >literally thousands of geometries that we'd need to support. I'm afraid I have to agree with Warner here. I was hoping that the vendors would standardize on a limited number of geometries, but it seems that yet again my faith in the wisdom of hardware vendors is not supported by evidence. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.