From owner-freebsd-fs Tue Feb 10 16:50:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA19888 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 16:50:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA19883 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 16:50:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dyson@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA07191; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 19:50:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dyson) Message-Id: <199802110050.TAA07191@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: Any Performance Numbers In-Reply-To: <9802108871.AA887143102@meridian-data.com> from "roark_hilomen_at_meridian@meridian-data.com" at "Feb 10, 98 12:43:59 pm" To: roark_hilomen_at_meridian@meridian-data.com Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 19:50:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org roark_hilomen_at_meridian@meridian-data.com said: > > Does anyone have performance numbers? > > How fast is Softupdate vs DOW vs Standard Clustered FFS (and vs LFS)? > The Kirk softupdate stuff is as fast or (much) faster than our -async. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message