From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 14:58:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8188616A41B for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6059913C469 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1BEu1Ku003781; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:56:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m1BEtvNk003778; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:55:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:55:57 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" In-Reply-To: <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> Message-ID: <20080211154845.U3664@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05924.5000405@cs.okstate.edu> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:58:26 -0000 > """ > > ...where "Authorized Operating Systems" is only Windows, Linux, Solaris and > Mac OS as defined before the initial sentence, and as such, there's no clause > that allows you to use the software on BSDs, and finally, that makes it > forbidden to use on BSDs. > > This is another reason why Flash is bad, bad, bad. Am I repeating myself? > i will repeat what i repeated for a long time everywhere, including this list. If Macromedia (or anyone else) DO NOT want us to use their product, simply accept their will. If webpage owner don't like us to view their page for any reason, simply don't view it, because this is what they want. DO NOT force anyone to anything. for few years flash is popular, i'm sure i lost no valuable webpages, while not watching lots of useless, but brainwashing pages. Flash, like lots of other things, are used in attempt to "guide" the reader and try to control brain - so he/she will watch that site the way author wanted, not he/she wants. Other pages are made the way that you HAVE to use (often nonexisting or hidden) "site maps" to get to actual information. I - personally - have no flash, java off, javascript off, and all is OK. rarely i turn on javascript. Good sites, having lots of real information, works best without all these craps.